Abstract:
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB), the independent Canadian audit regulator charged with improving audit quality in Canada. I exploit a unique setting where a subset of Canadian audit engagements is subject to joint inspection by CPAB and the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and develop ex ante expectations for CPAB’s inspection outcomes based on regulatory capture theory (Dal Bó, 2006; Stigler, 1971). Using hand collected data from CPAB and PCAOB, I find that CPAB reports significantly lower deficiency rate and fewer areas of deficiency than PCAOB for Canadian Big 4 accounting firms but reports similar deficiency rates indistinguishable from PCAOB’s for non-Big firms. I further find that CPAB’s inspection reports disclose less information than PCAOB’s. This study provides new evidence on behaviour of a non-US audit regulator and has implications for auditing researchers and practitioners.
Contact Emails:
zcarol2@ceibs.edu